Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #11189 > unrolled thread

Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

Started byprzemolicc@poczta.fm
First post2011-08-11 08:30 +0200
Last post2011-08-11 08:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? przemolicc@poczta.fm - 2011-08-11 08:30 +0200

#11189 — Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

Fromprzemolicc@poczta.fm
Date2011-08-11 08:30 +0200
SubjectRe: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?
Message-ID<mailman.2154.1313047085.1164.python-list@python.org>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:38:42PM +0100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Which SQL library are you suing?
> 
> And this is why I should proof-read BEFORE, not AFTER, sending.
> 
> Which SQL library are you *using*?

cx_oracle

Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)



















































----------------------------------------------------------------
Doladuj telefon przez Internet!
Sprawdz >> http://linkint.pl/f2a06

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web