Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #6410 > unrolled thread

Re: Python-list Digest, Vol 92, Issue 232

Started byRichard Parker <r.richardparker@comcast.net>
First post2011-05-27 09:51 -0700
Last post2011-05-27 09:51 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Python-list Digest, Vol 92, Issue 232 Richard Parker <r.richardparker@comcast.net> - 2011-05-27 09:51 -0700

#6410 — Re: Python-list Digest, Vol 92, Issue 232

FromRichard Parker <r.richardparker@comcast.net>
Date2011-05-27 09:51 -0700
SubjectRe: Python-list Digest, Vol 92, Issue 232
Message-ID<mailman.2153.1306515089.9059.python-list@python.org>
 Sometimes
>> I'll drop in suggestions to future maintainers like, "consider
>> refactoring with with perform_frobnitz_action()"
> 
> Usually, I address future-me with comments like that (on the
> assumption that there's nobody in the world sadistic enough to want to
> maintain my code). But I never name future-me, the comments will be
> addressed to "the subsequent maintainer" or somesuch. I do assume,
> though, that future-me has forgotten everything about the code, and
> since past-me left some comments that current-me has read, I think the
> assumption is fairly accurate. (Did I *really* write that code? It has
> my name on it.....)
> 
> Chris Angelico
> 

Rather than sadistic, one would likely be masochistic to undertake the maintenance of  my code :-) I have had many moments where I have later asked the question "Did I write this code?."

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web