Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #58476 > unrolled thread

Re: Compiling Python3 for BeagleBone Black (Angstrom distro)

Started byTerry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
First post2013-11-04 21:17 -0500
Last post2013-11-04 21:17 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Compiling Python3 for BeagleBone Black (Angstrom distro) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-11-04 21:17 -0500

#58476 — Re: Compiling Python3 for BeagleBone Black (Angstrom distro)

FromTerry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Date2013-11-04 21:17 -0500
SubjectRe: Compiling Python3 for BeagleBone Black (Angstrom distro)
Message-ID<mailman.2040.1383617870.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 11/4/2013 7:23 PM, Travis Griggs wrote:
>
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Travis Griggs <travisgriggs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm playing with a BeagleBone Black running the angstrom distro. Of course, stock python is 2.7, I'd rather use python3. There isn't a python3 package available for angstrom. So I downloaded the source and compiled. It seemed to work pretty well. I used the basic approach outlined in the REAMDE:
>>
>> ./configure
>> make
>> make test
>> make install
>>
>> Now, I want to repeat the process, but be a little more judicious about what all is compiled. For example, I don't really need tk stuff (in fact, it just kept telling me it wasn't there). And there's probably a number of other modules/libraries in the kitchen sink known as the stock install, that I could forgo on a tiny little computer like this.
>>
>> I see, looking at ./configure --help | less, that I could provide --disable-FEATURE and --without-PACKAGE directives to my ./configure invocation. But what I don't see is how to generate a list of what FEATURES/PACKAGES I could put there for consideration of omission. Is there some magic juju that generates that?
>>
>
> Should I have asked this question on python-dev instead? Not currently subscribed there… but would if that would generate more informed responses.

pydev is for concrete discussion of developing future CPython releases.
Questions about using current releases belong here. If you cannot get an 
answer after a week, because no one knows or can get the answer, then 
there might be a case for improving something.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web