Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #30999 > unrolled thread

Re: [Python-ideas] Make "is" checks on non-singleton literals errors

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [Python-ideas] Make "is" checks on non-singleton literals errors Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 18:06 +1100

#30999 — Re: [Python-ideas] Make "is" checks on non-singleton literals errors

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
> Maybe we should do something more drastic and always create a new,
> unique constant whenever a literal occurs as an argument of 'is' or
> 'is not'? Then such code would never work, leading people to examine
> their code more closely. I betcha we have people who could change the
> bytecode compiler easily enough to do that. (I'm not seriously
> proposing this, except as a threat of what we could do if the
> SyntaxWarning is rejected. :-)

That wouldn't guarantee that the code would never work, merely that
the 'is' checks would be never true. Dangerous if the condition is a
guard for an unusual condition. A unit test could of course catch it,
but that assumes that everyone who writes "if x is 0" has tests
probing both branches of that check...

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web