Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #45703 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-05-21 19:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-05-21 19:37 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Myth Busters: % "this old style of formatting will eventually be removed from the language" Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-05-21 19:37 -0700
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-21 19:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Myth Busters: % "this old style of formatting will eventually be removed from the language" |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1948.1369193191.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On 05/21/2013 07:26 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote: > I was looking for something else and just found what I think is the place where I was first exposed to the myth[1]: > > "Since str.format() is quite new, a lot of Python code still uses the % operator. However, because this old style of formatting will eventually be removed from the language, str.format() should generally be used." > > Is this tutorial outdated or this still an issue? It was exuberant wishful thinking. ;) While .format() does have its uses, % is in wide-spread use even among the core-devs. It's not going away any time soon. -- ~Ethan~
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web