Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #45688 > unrolled thread

RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-21 23:02 +0300

#45688 — RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator

----------------------------------------
> To: python-list@python.org
> From: breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 20:26:41 +0100
>
> On 21/05/2013 20:13, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>> Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd like to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
>>
>> That's unlikely to change. If not deprecated already string
>> interpolation using the modulo operator has lost favor to the string
>> object's format method.
>>

I used to think str.__mod__() was going to be deprecated until Steven told me it was a myth! Think I got that idea from the own Python docs, but it's gone by now. Nevermind...

The fact is I have no need for str.format(). It's slow and awkward. str.format() looks like COBOL/Java idiom to me. I love Python! '%' is much more cool!!!

> Please stop perpetuating this myth, see
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116789.html
> and http://bugs.python.org/issue14123
>
> --
> If you're using GoogleCrap™ please read this
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython.
>
> Mark Lawrence
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list 		 	   		  

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web