Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #86489 > unrolled thread

Re: Python Worst Practices

Started byMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
First post2015-02-26 09:00 +0000
Last post2015-02-26 09:00 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Python Worst Practices Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-26 09:00 +0000

#86489 — Re: Python Worst Practices

FromMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2015-02-26 09:00 +0000
SubjectRe: Python Worst Practices
Message-ID<mailman.19250.1424941505.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 26/02/2015 03:05, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 02/25/2015 08:44 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 25/02/2015 20:45, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>> http://www.slideshare.net/pydanny/python-worst-practices
>>>
>>> Any that should be added to this list?  Any that be removed as not that
>>> bad?
>>>
>>
>> Throwing in my own, how about built-in functions should not use "object"
>> as the one and only argument, and a keyword argument at that.
>>
>
> def marry(object = False)...
>
>
> if anybody has any cause to object, let him speak now...
>

Fell off me chair larfing.


-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web