Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #86469 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-02-26 15:17 +1100 |
| Last post | 2015-03-01 11:13 -0800 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Python Worst Practices Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 15:17 +1100
Re: Python Worst Practices wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-03-01 11:13 -0800
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-02-26 15:17 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Python Worst Practices |
| Message-ID | <mailman.19237.1424924242.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Both of which have no technical justification; a PDF presentation > document would do just as well and avoid those problems. Probably doesn't even need PDF. The slides are approximately as complex as those in Ned Batchelder's "Pragmatic Unicode" presentation, which is represented entirely in text. Maybe there's some slight additional complications, but not many. I'd really like to see a lot more presentations done in pure text. Scrap the graphics, scrap the fancy transitions, they aren't helping you make your case anyway. Just give me the content. Tell me what you're saying. I don't care about the fluff. ChrisA
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wxjmfauth@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-01 11:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d4c2ee2f-5fc1-41f7-b13a-d20fbb3e233b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #86469 |
Le jeudi 26 février 2015 05:17:35 UTC+1, Chris Angelico a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > > Both of which have no technical justification; a PDF presentation > > document would do just as well and avoid those problems. > > Probably doesn't even need PDF. The slides are approximately as > complex as those in Ned Batchelder's "Pragmatic Unicode" presentation, > which is represented entirely in text. Maybe there's some slight > additional complications, but not many. > > I'd really like to see a lot more presentations done in pure text. > Scrap the graphics, scrap the fancy transitions, they aren't helping > you make your case anyway. Just give me the content. Tell me what > you're saying. I don't care about the fluff. > ======== For serious Unicode presentations, PDF or XPS are more or less the only valid candidates. For the simple reason, these file formats embed the "fonts" (in "quotes", because it's a litte bit more complicate). Examples: unicode.org: the Unicode Character Code Charts. jmf
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web