Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #86168 > unrolled thread

Re: Standard

Started byDennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
First post2015-02-22 18:03 -0500
Last post2015-02-22 18:03 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Standard Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-02-22 18:03 -0500

#86168 — Re: Standard

FromDennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
Date2015-02-22 18:03 -0500
SubjectRe: Standard
Message-ID<mailman.19038.1424646233.18130.python-list@python.org>
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:27:36 -0600, Phillip Fleming <carnovg@gmail.com>
declaimed the following:

>In my opinion, Python will not take off like C/C++ if there is no ANSI
>standard.

	C (if not C++) had a fairly good life before it got standardized...

	Consider that before things like Tiny-C, Small-C, (and for TRS-80,
first LC [integer only subset, like the other two] and then MC [full K&R,
as I recall]) showed up the only place one encountered C was on UNIX
systems. Of course, there were also p-code Pascal's around that time-frame,
lots of BASIC variants, and one could understand a processor instruction
set well enough to create optimized assembly by hand -- in contrast to now,
when one has to understand overlapping processor instruction fetches, cache
hits, etc. before one can optimize assembly.

	
-- 
	Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
    wlfraed@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web