Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #85951 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-02-20 16:57 +1100 |
| Last post | 2015-02-20 16:57 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: What behavior would you expect? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-20 16:57 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-02-20 16:57 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: What behavior would you expect? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18913.1424411875.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jason Friedman <jsf80238@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd still advise using my_list.sort() rather than sorted(), as you >> don't need to retain the original. >> > > Hmm. > > Trying to figure out what that looks like. > If I understand correctly, list.sort() returns None. > What would I return to the caller? Check its docs: it sorts the list in place. So you return the list, after you sort it. It's like appending to a list: None is returned and the list itself is changed. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web