Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #104999 > unrolled thread

RE: empty clause of for loops

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  RE: empty clause of for loops Joaquin Alzola <Joaquin.Alzola@lebara.com> - 2016-03-16 10:28 +0000

#104999 — RE: empty clause of for loops

You could do something like ...

If len(my_iterable) is not 0:
for x in my_iterable:
     # do
else:
     # do something else

There should be a more code efficient way to do this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Python-list [mailto:python-list-bounces+joaquin.alzola=lebara.com@python.org] On Behalf Of Sven R. Kunze
Sent: 16 March 2016 10:23
To: Python List <python-list@python.org>
Subject: empty clause of for loops

Hi,

a colleague of mine (I write this mail because I am on the list) has the following issue:


for x in my_iterable:
     # do
empty:
     # do something else


What's the most Pythonic way of doing this?

Best,
Sven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
This email is confidential and may be subject to privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose its content but contact the sender immediately upon receipt.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web