Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #96076 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-06 15:31 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-09-06 15:31 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Wheels For ... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-09-06 15:31 -0400
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-06 15:31 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Wheels For ... |
| Message-ID | <mailman.184.1441567924.8327.python-list@python.org> |
On 9/6/2015 1:33 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote: > Hi folks, > > currently, I came across http://pythonwheels.com/ during researching how > to make a proper Python distribution for PyPI. I thought it would be > great idea to tell other maintainers to upload their content as wheels > so I approached a couple of them. Some of them already provided wheels. > > Happy being able to have built my own distribution, I discussed the > issue at hand with some people and I would like to share my findings and > propose some ideas: > > 1) documentation is weirdly split up/distributed and references old > material > 2) once up and running (setup.cfg, setup.py etc. etc.) it works but > everybody needs to do it on their own > 3) more than one way to do (upload, wheel, source/binary etc.) it (sigh) > 4) making contact to propose wheels on github or per email is easy > otherwise almost impossible or very tedious > 5) reactions went evenly split from "none", "yes", "when ready" to "nope" > > None: well, okay > yes: that's good > when ready: well, okay > nope: what a pity for wheels; example: > https://github.com/simplejson/simplejson/issues/122 > > I personally find the situation not satisfying. Someone proposes the > following solution in form of a question: > > Why do developers need to build their distribution themselves? > > I had not real answer to him, but pondering a while over it, I found it > really insightful. Viewing this from a different angle, packaging your > own distribution is actually a waste of time. It is a tedious, > error-prone task involving no creativity whatsoever. Developers on the > other hand are actually people with very little time and a lot of > creativity at hand which should spend better. The logical conclusion > would be that PyPI should build wheels for the developers for every > python/platform combination necessary. > > > With this post, I would like raise awareness of the people in charge of > the Python infrastructure. pypa is in charge of packaging. https://github.com/pypa I believe the google groups link is their discussion forum. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web