Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #45530 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-05-18 17:05 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-05-18 17:05 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: TypeError: unbound method add() must be called with BinaryTree instance as first argument (got nothing instead) Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-05-18 17:05 -0400
| From | Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-18 17:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: TypeError: unbound method add() must be called with BinaryTree instance as first argument (got nothing instead) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1819.1368911165.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On 5/18/2013 3:46 PM, Peter Otten wrote: > Dan Stromberg wrote: > >> python 2.x, python 3.x and pypy all give this same error, though jython >> errors out at a different point in the same method. > > By the way, 3.x doesn't have unbound methods, so that should work. It does for this example (3.3.1) >>> c = C() >>> c.m() <__main__.C object at 0x00000000033FC5F8> >>> C.m(c) <__main__.C object at 0x00000000033FC5F8> >>> C.m(self=c) <__main__.C object at 0x00000000033FC5F8>
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web