Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #84541 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-01-25 13:24 +1100 |
| Last post | 2015-01-25 13:24 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Benchmarking some modules - strange result Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 13:24 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 13:24 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Benchmarking some modules - strange result |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18123.1422152675.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> wrote: > For simplicity, let's say I've been running the suite of performance > tests within a single interpreter - so I test one module thoroughly, > then move on to the next without exiting the interpreter. > [chomp more details] Do the modules import stuff that's staying imported? That could majorly affect performance. What about .pyc files? I don't know if you can truly reset the interpreter. Snapshotting sys.modules and reinstating it afterwards would help, but there are other concerns too. I would personally just restart the interpreter each time, frankly; it's the easiest way to be sure. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web