Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #24896 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-07-05 01:05 -0400 |
| Last post | 2012-07-05 01:05 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: simpler increment of time values? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 01:05 -0400
| From | Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-05 01:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: simpler increment of time values? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1811.1341464789.4697.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Jason Friedman <jason@powerpull.net> wrote: > I have some thoughts on a solution, but first, what is 12:45 plus 12 > hours? What is 12:45 minus 13 hours? Is there anything unusual that can happen for a notion of time that is dateless, timezone-unaware, and DST-free? I would imagine that under these constraints the answers are always 0:45 and 23:45 respectively. Although I guess it doesn't hurt to check. -- Devin
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web