Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #10770 > unrolled thread

Re: Early binding as an option

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2011-08-02 23:26 +0100
Last post2011-08-02 23:26 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Early binding as an option Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-02 23:26 +0100

#10770 — Re: Early binding as an option

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2011-08-02 23:26 +0100
SubjectRe: Early binding as an option
Message-ID<mailman.1809.1312323964.1164.python-list@python.org>
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the other hand: It might be interesting, that the early binding would
> just take place when python is invoked with -O
>

This could be an excellent safety catch, but on the other hand, it
might destroy all value of the feature - once again, it would be
optimizing in the sole case where the code is probably better
rewritten in C.

Or would this be a sort of "half-way house" - this is where we need
more performance, let's spend two minutes tweaking it in Python rather
than dropping to C - to get some of the performance gains?

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web