Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #10770 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-08-02 23:26 +0100 |
| Last post | 2011-08-02 23:26 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Early binding as an option Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-02 23:26 +0100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-08-02 23:26 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Early binding as an option |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1809.1312323964.1164.python-list@python.org> |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> wrote: > On the other hand: It might be interesting, that the early binding would > just take place when python is invoked with -O > This could be an excellent safety catch, but on the other hand, it might destroy all value of the feature - once again, it would be optimizing in the sole case where the code is probably better rewritten in C. Or would this be a sort of "half-way house" - this is where we need more performance, let's spend two minutes tweaking it in Python rather than dropping to C - to get some of the performance gains? ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web