Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #84052 > unrolled thread

Re: Trees

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Trees Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-01-20 02:46 +0000

#84052 — Re: Trees

On 20/01/2015 00:49, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Zachary Gilmartin
> <zacharygilmartin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why aren't there trees in the python standard library?
>
> Trees are kind of specialized datastructures; no one type of tree
> solves all tree-related problems suitably well.
>
> I think probably the most common need for a tree is implementing a
> cache, but most times you're tempted to sort inside a loop you're
> better off with a tree.
>
> I've put some time into python trees; most of them are on pypi and at:
> http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/datastructures/
> and:
> http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/python-tree-and-heap-comparison/
>
> HTH
>

I don't know if you've seen this http://kmike.ru/python-data-structures/ 
but maybe of interest.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web