Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #57933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-10-29 11:54 -0500 |
| Last post | 2013-10-29 11:54 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
stacked decorators and consolidating Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-10-29 11:54 -0500
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-29 11:54 -0500 |
| Subject | stacked decorators and consolidating |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1765.1383065569.18130.python-list@python.org> |
I've got some decorators that work fine as such:
@dec1(args1)
@dec2(args2)
@dec3(args3)
def myfun(...):
pass
However, I used that sequence quite a bit, so I figured I could do
something like
dec_all = dec1(args1)(dec2(args2)(dec3(args3)))
to consolidate the whole mess down to
@dec_all
def myfun(...):
pass
However, this yields different (test-breaking) results. Messing
around, I found that if I write it as
dec_all = lambda fn: dec1(args1)(dec2(args2)(dec3(args3)(fn)))
it works and passes all preexisting tests.
What am I missing that would cause this difference in behavior?
-tkc
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web