Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #83628 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-01-13 07:32 +1100 |
| Last post | 2015-01-13 07:32 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Python 3 regex? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-13 07:32 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-13 07:32 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Python 3 regex? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.17637.1421094729.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ian <hobson42@gmail.com> wrote: > My recommendation would be to write a recursive decent parser for your > files. > > That way will be easier to write, much easier to modify and almost certainly > faster that a RE solution - and it can easily give you all the information > in the file thus future proofing it. Generally, even a recursive descent parser will be overkill. It's pretty easy to do simple string manipulation to get the info you want; maybe that means restricting the syntax some, but for a personal-use script, that's usually no big cost. The example I gave requires that the indentation be correct, and on this mailing list, I think people agree that that's not a deal-breaker :) ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web