Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #5707 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-05-18 09:40 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-05-18 09:40 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Python 3.x and bytes Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-18 09:40 -0700
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-18 09:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Python 3.x and bytes |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1756.1305736108.9059.python-list@python.org> |
Ian Kelly wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> The big question, though, is would you do it this way: >> >> some_var = bytes(23).replace(b'\x00', b'a') >> >> or this way? >> >> some_var = bytes(b'a' * 23) > > Actually, I would just do it this way: > > some_var = b'a' * 23 > > That's already a bytes object. Passing it into the constructor is redundant. However, as I just discovered, it works well when dealing with a bytearray object: some_var = bytearray(b' ' * size) # want space initialized, not null ~Ethan~
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web