Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #45276 > unrolled thread

Re: Differences of "!=" operator behavior in python3 and python2 [ bug? ]

Started byDave Angel <davea@davea.name>
First post2013-05-13 21:41 -0400
Last post2013-05-13 21:41 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Differences of "!=" operator behavior in python3 and python2 [ bug? ] Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-05-13 21:41 -0400

#45276 — Re: Differences of "!=" operator behavior in python3 and python2 [ bug? ]

FromDave Angel <davea@davea.name>
Date2013-05-13 21:41 -0400
SubjectRe: Differences of "!=" operator behavior in python3 and python2 [ bug? ]
Message-ID<mailman.1654.1368495711.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 05/13/2013 07:30 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 13May2013 19:22, Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> wrote:
> | On 05/13/2013 06:53 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> | >I much prefer the alternative <> for != but some silly people insisted
> | >that this be removed from Python3.  Just how stupid can you get?
> |
> | So which special methods should the <> operator call?  By rights it
> | ought to call both __gt__ and __lt__ and return True if either of
> | them is True.
>
> Surely it should require both of them to be true...

Then it would never be true.  At least not for numbers.

>
> Personally I'm for != given we have ==. Aside from notational
> consistency it makes conceptual sense for unordered types, which
> <> does not really.

That's the point of mentioning __gt__ and __lt__,  they aren't available 
on unordered types.



-- 
DaveA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web