Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #10574 > unrolled thread

Re: removing nested iffs

Started byPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
First post2011-07-30 09:15 +0200
Last post2011-07-30 09:15 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: removing nested iffs Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-07-30 09:15 +0200

#10574 — Re: removing nested iffs

FromPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Date2011-07-30 09:15 +0200
SubjectRe: removing nested iffs
Message-ID<mailman.1653.1312010164.1164.python-list@python.org>
Chris Angelico wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
>> def format_pairs(pairs):
>> for template, value in pairs:
>> if value is None:
>> break
>> yield template.format(value)
>>
> 
> Cool! May I suggest a trifling change:
> 
> def format_pairs(*pairs):
> for template, value in pairs:
> if value is None: break
> yield template.format(value)
> 
> That way, the call can dispense with the [] in the argument list. This
> is a pretty clean solution though, I like it.

Alternatively you can move the list literal into an extra line:

    pairs = [
        ...
    ]
    return "".join(format_pairs(pairs))

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web