Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #10574 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-07-30 09:15 +0200 |
| Last post | 2011-07-30 09:15 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: removing nested iffs Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-07-30 09:15 +0200
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-30 09:15 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: removing nested iffs |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1653.1312010164.1164.python-list@python.org> |
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
>> def format_pairs(pairs):
>> for template, value in pairs:
>> if value is None:
>> break
>> yield template.format(value)
>>
>
> Cool! May I suggest a trifling change:
>
> def format_pairs(*pairs):
> for template, value in pairs:
> if value is None: break
> yield template.format(value)
>
> That way, the call can dispense with the [] in the argument list. This
> is a pretty clean solution though, I like it.
Alternatively you can move the list literal into an extra line:
pairs = [
...
]
return "".join(format_pairs(pairs))
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web