Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #107747 > unrolled thread

Re: Pythonic style

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Pythonic style Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-04-27 20:52 -0700

#107747 — Re: Pythonic style

On 04/27/2016 08:07 PM, Christopher Reimer wrote:
> On 4/27/2016 7:07 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
 >> Ian Kelly wrote:

>>>      self.__dict__ = {'key', 'value'}
>>>
>>> is essentially equivalent to:
>>>
>>>      self.key = value
 >>
>> I would say the latter is more Pythonic, because it:
 >>
 >> [snip]
 >>
>> * Uses the built-in mechanisms of Python (don't invoke magic attributes,
>>    instead use the system that makes use of them behind the scenes).
>
> In short,  my original code before I turned it into a separate
> dictionary. *sigh*

No.

The point Ben was trying to make is this:  you should never* call 
__dunder__ methods in normal code; there is no need to do so:

- use len(), not __len__()
- use next(), not __next__()
- use some_instance.an_attribute, not some_instance.__dict__['an_attribute']

--
~Ethan~

* Okay, maybe /almost/ never.  About the only time you need to is when 
giving your classes special methods, such as __add__ or __repr__.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web