Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #45201 > unrolled thread

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

Started byTerry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
First post2013-05-12 16:26 -0400
Last post2013-05-12 16:26 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-05-12 16:26 -0400

#45201 — Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

FromTerry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Date2013-05-12 16:26 -0400
SubjectRe: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2
Message-ID<mailman.1596.1368390607.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 5/12/2013 1:18 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 5/8/2013 10:39 PM, Mark Janssen wrote:
>>> ...The field needs re-invented and re-centered.[...]
>> For anyone who want to be involved.  See the wikiwikiweb -- a tool
>> that every programmer should know and use --  and these pages:
>> ComputerScienceVersionTwo and ObjectOrientedRefactored.
>
> I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being
> unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding
> who is saying what, or in response to whom.

I certainly found it confusing that something responder and OP comments 
were in normal text and italic respectively, and sometimes the opposite, 
and maybe sometimes both in normal types.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web