Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #30425 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Franck Ditter <franck@ditter.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-09-28 20:42 +0200 |
| Last post | 2012-10-01 10:22 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
print or write on a text file ? Franck Ditter <franck@ditter.org> - 2012-09-28 20:42 +0200
Re: print or write on a text file ? Wayne Werner <wayne@waynewerner.com> - 2012-09-28 16:33 -0500
Re: print or write on a text file ? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-28 20:41 -0400
Re: print or write on a text file ? nn <pruebauno@latinmail.com> - 2012-10-01 10:22 -0700
| From | Franck Ditter <franck@ditter.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-28 20:42 +0200 |
| Subject | print or write on a text file ? |
| Message-ID | <franck-20D159.20420228092012@news.free.fr> |
Hi !
Here is Python 3.3
Is it better in any way to use print(x,x,x,file='out')
or out.write(x) ? Any reason to prefer any of them ?
There should be a printlines, like readlines ?
Thanks,
franck
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wayne Werner <wayne@waynewerner.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-28 16:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1584.1348868015.27098.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #30425 |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Franck Ditter wrote: > Hi ! > Here is Python 3.3 > Is it better in any way to use print(x,x,x,file='out') > or out.write(x) ? Any reason to prefer any of them ? > There should be a printlines, like readlines ? > Thanks, The print function automatically appends newlines to the end of what it prints. So if you had text = 'Hello!' and you did: print(text, file=outfile) then outfile would contain 'Hello!\n' In contrast, outfile.write(text) would only write 'Hello!'. No newline. There are lots of other handy things you can do with the print function: values = [1,2,3,4] print(*values, sep='\n', file=outfile) I'll leave it to you to experiment. HTH, Wayne
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-28 20:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1592.1348879313.27098.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #30425 |
On 9/28/2012 2:42 PM, Franck Ditter wrote: > Hi ! > Here is Python 3.3 > Is it better in any way to use print(x,x,x,file='out') > or out.write(x) ? Any reason to prefer any of them ? print converts objects to strings and adds separators and terminators. If you have a string s and want to output it as is, out.write(s) is perhaps faster. It is 6 chars shorted than print(s, file=out). > There should be a printlines, like readlines ? No, now that files are iterators, I believe readlines is somewhat obsolete. file.readlines() == list(file) The only reason not to deprecate it is for the hint parameter to limit the bytes read. That is little harder to do with the iterator. If you have any iterator of lines, for line in lines: line.print() is quite sufficient. There is little or no need for output limitation. -- Terry Jan Reedy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nn <pruebauno@latinmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-01 10:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a47f021d-8c28-41f7-ad32-431696557780@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #30425 |
On Sep 28, 2:42 pm, Franck Ditter <fra...@ditter.org> wrote: > Hi ! > Here is Python 3.3 > Is it better in any way to use print(x,x,x,file='out') > or out.write(x) ? Any reason to prefer any of them ? > There should be a printlines, like readlines ? > Thanks, > > franck There is out.writelines(lst)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web