Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #42846 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-04-05 12:59 -0600 |
| Last post | 2013-04-06 10:30 +0000 |
| Articles | 8 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2013-04-05 12:59 -0600
Re: a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-04-05 19:27 +0000
Re: a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-05 20:30 +0000
Re: a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2013-04-05 18:18 -0600
Re: a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-06 02:37 +0000
Re: a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 13:49 +1100
Re: a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-04-05 23:22 -0400
Re: a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types mblume <foobar@invalid.invalid> - 2013-04-06 10:30 +0000
| From | "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-05 12:59 -0600 |
| Subject | a couple of questions: pickling objects and strict types |
| Message-ID | <mailman.159.1365188823.3114.python-list@python.org> |
Hello all: I've been using Python for a while now, but I have one larger problem. I come from a c++ background; though it doesn't help in catching runtime errors, being able to compile a program helps catch a lot of syntax errors. I know about pychecker, which is somewhat useful. Do people have other methods for handling this? Also, I'm depickling objects. Is there a way I can force pickle to call the object's ctor? I set up events per object, but when it just deserializes it doesn't set all that up. Thanks, -- Take care, Ty http://tds-solutions.net The aspen project: a barebones light-weight mud engine: http://code.google.com/p/aspenmud He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-05 19:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kjn8j2$6kr$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #42846 |
In <mailman.159.1365188823.3114.python-list@python.org> "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> writes:
> Hello all:
> I've been using Python for a while now, but I have one larger problem.
> I come from a c++ background; though it doesn't help in catching runtime
> errors, being able to compile a program helps catch a lot of syntax
> errors. I know about pychecker, which is somewhat useful. Do people have
> other methods for handling this?
The py_compile module can catch some obvious syntax errors, such as
incorrect indentation levels or a missing colon at the end of an if
statement.
But it won't catch other errors such as using a variable name before it's
defined. For that, you can use an external program such as pylint or
pyflakes.
--
John Gordon A is for Amy, who fell down the stairs
gordon@panix.com B is for Basil, assaulted by bears
-- Edward Gorey, "The Gashlycrumb Tinies"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-05 20:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <515f345a$0$29995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #42846 |
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:59:04 -0600, Littlefield, Tyler wrote: > Hello all: > I've been using Python for a while now, but I have one larger problem. I > come from a c++ background; though it doesn't help in catching runtime > errors, being able to compile a program helps catch a lot of syntax > errors. I know about pychecker, which is somewhat useful. Do people have > other methods for handling this? Do you tend to make a lot of syntax errors? Python also catches syntax errors at compile-time. I won't speak for others, but I hardly ever make syntax errors: between Python's simple, surprise-free syntax, and modern, syntax-colouring editors, I find that I rarely make syntax errors. > Also, I'm depickling objects. Is there a way I can force pickle to call > the object's ctor? I set up events per object, but when it just > deserializes it doesn't set all that up. Thanks, What's the object's ctor? What sort of objects are you dealing with? -- Steven
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-05 18:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.170.1365207530.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #42849 |
On 4/5/2013 2:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:59:04 -0600, Littlefield, Tyler wrote:
>
>> Hello all:
>> I've been using Python for a while now, but I have one larger problem. I
>> come from a c++ background; though it doesn't help in catching runtime
>> errors, being able to compile a program helps catch a lot of syntax
>> errors. I know about pychecker, which is somewhat useful. Do people have
>> other methods for handling this?
>
> Do you tend to make a lot of syntax errors?
Not a -lot-, but there are things I don't catch sometimes.
> Python also catches syntax errors at compile-time. I won't speak for
> others, but I hardly ever make syntax errors: between Python's simple,
> surprise-free syntax, and modern, syntax-colouring editors, I find that I
> rarely make syntax errors.
I am blind, so colorful editors don't really work all that well for me.
>> Also, I'm depickling objects. Is there a way I can force pickle to call
>> the object's ctor? I set up events per object, but when it just
>> deserializes it doesn't set all that up. Thanks,
> What's the object's ctor? What sort of objects are you dealing with?
>
>
>
def __init__(self):
self.events = {}
self.components = []
self.contents = []
self.uid = uuid4().int
self.events['OnLook'] = teventlet()
Basically events don't get initialized like I'd like after I depickle
objects.
--
Take care,
Ty
http://tds-solutions.net
The aspen project: a barebones light-weight mud engine:
http://code.google.com/p/aspenmud
He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-06 02:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <515f8a6b$0$29995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #42866 |
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:18:51 -0600, Littlefield, Tyler wrote:
> On 4/5/2013 2:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:59:04 -0600, Littlefield, Tyler wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all:
>>> I've been using Python for a while now, but I have one larger problem.
>>> I come from a c++ background; though it doesn't help in catching
>>> runtime errors, being able to compile a program helps catch a lot of
>>> syntax errors. I know about pychecker, which is somewhat useful. Do
>>> people have other methods for handling this?
>>
>> Do you tend to make a lot of syntax errors?
>
> Not a -lot-, but there are things I don't catch sometimes.
As we all do. But fortunately the Python compiler catches syntax errors.
>> Python also catches syntax errors at compile-time. I won't speak for
>> others, but I hardly ever make syntax errors: between Python's simple,
>> surprise-free syntax, and modern, syntax-colouring editors, I find that
>> I rarely make syntax errors.
>
> I am blind, so colorful editors don't really work all that well for me.
Fair point.
>>> Also, I'm depickling objects. Is there a way I can force pickle to
>>> call the object's ctor? I set up events per object, but when it just
>>> deserializes it doesn't set all that up. Thanks,
>> What's the object's ctor? What sort of objects are you dealing with?
>>
>>
>>
> def __init__(self):
> self.events = {}
> self.components = []
> self.contents = []
> self.uid = uuid4().int
> self.events['OnLook'] = teventlet()
>
>
> Basically events don't get initialized like I'd like after I depickle
> objects.
Did you mean "constructor" rather than C T O R ? Perhaps your voice-to-
text software (if you are using such) misheard you.
Correct, by default pickle does not call the __init__ method, it just
reconstructs the instance. Basically, it takes a snapshot of the
instance's internal state (the __dict__) and reconstructs from the
snapshot.
This is explained in the documentation here:
http://docs.python.org/2/library/pickle.html#the-pickle-protocol
You can force the __init__ method to be called in a couple of different
ways. Perhaps this is the most straight-forward. Add a __setstate__
method to your class:
def __setstate__(self, state):
self.__dict__.update(state)
self.events['OnLook'] = teventlet()
--
Steven
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-06 13:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.179.1365216599.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #42878 |
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > Did you mean "constructor" rather than C T O R ? Perhaps your voice-to- > text software (if you are using such) misheard you. Side point: "ctor" is a common abbreviation for "constructor". ChrisA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-05 23:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.182.1365218863.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #42878 |
On 04/05/2013 10:49 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Steven D'Aprano > <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: >> Did you mean "constructor" rather than C T O R ? Perhaps your voice-to- >> text software (if you are using such) misheard you. > > Side point: "ctor" is a common abbreviation for "constructor". > > ChrisA > But neither term applies to the __init__() method, which is an initializer. The constructor is __new__() -- DaveA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mblume <foobar@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-06 10:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kjotg5$ml6$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #42878 |
Am Sat, 06 Apr 2013 02:37:31 +0000 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
>>> [...]
>> def __init__(self):
>> self.events = {}
>> self.components = []
>> self.contents = []
>> self.uid = uuid4().int
>> self.events['OnLook'] = teventlet()
>>
>>
>> Basically events don't get initialized like I'd like after I depickle
>> objects.
>
>
> Correct, by default pickle does not call the __init__ method, it just
> reconstructs the instance. Basically, it takes a snapshot of the
> instance's internal state (the __dict__) and reconstructs from the
> snapshot.
>
> [...]
>
To the OP: Did you really mean
self.events['OnLook'] = teventlet()
as opposed to:
self.events['OnLook'] = teventlet
The first one executes teventlet and then assigns the result of the function to
self.events['OnLook']. The second one assigns the function teventlet to the dict
entry (presumably so that it will be called when the objct detects the 'OnLook'
event). Unless the teventlet() function returns itself a function, an 'OnLook'
event won't do anything useful during the remaining life time of the object, I think.
Regards
Martin
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web