Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #28372 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-09-04 00:46 +0300 |
| Last post | 2012-09-04 00:46 +0300 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: set and dict iteration Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2012-09-04 00:46 +0300
| From | Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-04 00:46 +0300 |
| Subject | Re: set and dict iteration |
| Message-ID | <mailman.158.1346708810.27098.python-list@python.org> |
On 27.08.12 22:17, Ian Kelly wrote: > May I > suggest an alternate approach? Internally tag each set or dict with a > "version", which is just a C int. Every time the hash table is > modified, increment the version. When an iterator is created, store > the current version on the iterator. When the iterator is advanced, > check that the iterator version matches the dict/set version. If > they're not equal, raise an error. Oh, I'm surprised that this strategy is not used yet. I was sure that it is used.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web