Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #196211 > unrolled thread

in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 )

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

Contents

  in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 ) HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> - 2024-06-09 16:42 -0700
    Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 ) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2024-06-09 21:18 -0700
      Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 ) Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2024-06-13 15:01 +0300
        Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 ) candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-06-14 06:10 +0000
          Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 ...) (Posting On Python-List Prohibited) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-14 07:18 +0000
          Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 ) "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-python@hjp.at> - 2024-06-18 23:26 +0200
          Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 ) Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2024-06-20 17:20 +0300
            Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 ) candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-06-21 06:10 +0000

#196211 — in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 )

     #    (101 102 103     201 202 203     301 302 303    401 402 403 )


print(  [ x+i    for x in range(100,401,100)   for i in range(1,4) ] )


is there another (simple) way to write this?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#196214

HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
> is there another (simple) way to write this?

Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of
fobbing them onto other people.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#196245

Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
>> is there another (simple) way to write this?
>
> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of
> fobbing them onto other people.

Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited
resources, can never train it.

I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain zsh/bash:
  $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
  101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403

Phil
-- 
We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have
gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast
aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#196252

Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT):
> Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
>>> is there another (simple) way to write this?
>>
>> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of
>> fobbing them onto other people.
>
> Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited
> resources, can never train it.
>
> I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain zsh/bash:
>   $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
>   101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>
> Phil


I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}? I know there is
some syntax for "range of numbers" but I can't remember it exactly.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#196253 — Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 ...) (Posting On Python-List Prohibited)

On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 06:10:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:

> I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}?

Two dots, not three. Bash extension.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#196291

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2024-06-14 06:10:06 -0000, candycanearter07 via Python-list wrote:
> Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT):
> > I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain zsh/bash:
> >   $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
> >   101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
> 
> 
> I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}? I know there is
> some syntax for "range of numbers" but I can't remember it exactly.

Only two dots, not three:

% echo {1..4}0{1..3}
101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403

        hp

-- 
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) |                    |
| |   | hjp@hjp.at         |    -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |       challenge!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#196300

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
writes:

> Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT):
>> Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>>> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
>>>> is there another (simple) way to write this?
>>>
>>> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself
>>> instead of
>>> fobbing them onto other people.
>>
>> Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited
>> resources, can never train it.
>>
>> I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain
>> zsh/bash:
>>   $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
>>   101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>
> I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}? I know there is
> some syntax for "range of numbers" but I can't remember it exactly.

You're right, but it's even shorter -
$ echo {1..4}0{1..3}
101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403

Good golfing!

Phil
-- 
We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have
gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast
aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#196304

Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 14:20 this Thursday (GMT):
> candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
> writes:
>
>> Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT):
>>> Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>>>> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
>>>>> is there another (simple) way to write this?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself
>>>> instead of
>>>> fobbing them onto other people.
>>>
>>> Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited
>>> resources, can never train it.
>>>
>>> I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain
>>> zsh/bash:
>>>   $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
>>>   101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>>
>> I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}? I know there is
>> some syntax for "range of numbers" but I can't remember it exactly.
>
> You're right, but it's even shorter -
> $ echo {1..4}0{1..3}
> 101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>
> Good golfing!
>
> Phil


Thanks :D
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web