Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #24447 > unrolled thread

Re: tiffany 0.6 released

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: tiffany 0.6 released Christian Tismer <tismer@stackless.com> - 2012-06-25 23:36 +0200
    Re: tiffany 0.6 released Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-06-26 02:18 +0000
      Re: tiffany 0.6 released Christian Tismer <tismer@stackless.com> - 2012-06-27 02:34 +0200
      Re: tiffany 0.6 released Christian Tismer <tismer@stackless.com> - 2012-06-27 15:24 +0200
      Re: tiffany 0.6 released Christian Tismer <tismer@stackless.com> - 2012-06-27 15:32 +0200

#24447 — Re: tiffany 0.6 released

Abour tiffany...

On 6/25/12 3:46 AM, Christian Tismer wrote:
> Tiffany - Read/Write Multipage-Tiff with PIL without PIL
> ========================================================
>
> Tiffany stands for any tiff. The tiny module solves a large set of
> problems, has no dependencies and just works wherever Python works.
> Tiffany was developed in the course of the *DiDoCa* project and will
> always appear on PyPi.
>
> Version 0.6
> -----------
>
> This is a compatibility update for Python 3.2.
>
> Tiffany now works on Python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.2.
>
> This version also reduces the needed PIL files to only four. The
> same files work for python2 and python3.
>
> You can help me by sending some tiff files with different encoding
> and larger file size for testing.
>
> I'm also thinking of
>
> - an interface to Qt (without adding a dependency)
>
> - a command line interface, to make tiffany into a new tiff tool,
>
> - support for other toolkits that need to handle tiff files.
>
> Ideas about this are most welcome.
>
> Please let me know if this stuff works for you, and send requests to
> <tismer@stackless.com> or use the links in the bitbucket website:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/didoca/tiffany
>
> cheers -- Chris
>

Howdy.

I saw quite a lot of downloads of this package now, but not
a single reaction or any feedback.

How can I get more than just down-loaders?
I would like to know, if

- this module is of use for you
- if there are wishes to get more functionality
- if it makes sense at all
- if there are feature requests.

I could stop right now, freeze development as the stuff does what is
supposed to do in the relevant Python versions, name it 1.0 and forget
about it.

But I don't want to.
Can somebody please give me some feedback?
Criticism?
Helpful, useless, boring, whatsoever?

thanks -- cheers - Chris

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)<mailto:tismer@stackless.com>
tismerysoft GmbH             :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121     :    *Starship*http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam                :     PGP key ->  http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
work +49 173 24 18 776  mobile +49 173 24 18 776  fax n.a.
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
       whom do you want to sponsor today?http://www.stackless.com/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#24452

On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:36:59 +0200, Christian Tismer wrote:

> I saw quite a lot of downloads of this package now, but not a single
> reaction or any feedback.

Feel fortunate that you are getting any downloads at all :)

In my experience, if you are really lucky, perhaps one in a hundred 
people who download a package will comment about it.


> How can I get more than just down-loaders? I would like to know, if
> 
> - this module is of use for you
> - if there are wishes to get more functionality - if it makes sense at
> all
> - if there are feature requests.

You can't force people to comment. Do you have a blog where you can 
report new functionality or bug fixes? That might help drive interest.


> I could stop right now, freeze development as the stuff does what is
> supposed to do in the relevant Python versions, name it 1.0 and forget
> about it.

Sure, why not? If the package is feature complete, then why keep making 
changes to it just for the sake of change?


> But I don't want to.
> Can somebody please give me some feedback? Criticism?
> Helpful, useless, boring, whatsoever?

As frustrating as it is, you should expect that unless you have thousands 
of users, or tens of thousands, you won't get much feedback.

If you are writing software for fame and attention, you're in the wrong 
industry :)

BTW, I have no need for your software, but that doesn't mean it isn't a 
good and valuable piece of work. Thank you for sharing it with the 
community, even if only a few people find it useful.



-- 
Steven

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24492

Hi Steven,

On 26.06.12 04:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:36:59 +0200, Christian Tismer wrote:
>
>> I saw quite a lot of downloads of this package now, but not a single
>> reaction or any feedback.
> Feel fortunate that you are getting any downloads at all :)
>
> In my experience, if you are really lucky, perhaps one in a hundred
> people who download a package will comment about it.
>
Ok, good to know. This is my first little package (funny, eh? Did much
larger things), and this is new to me.

>> How can I get more than just down-loaders? I would like to know, if
>>
>> - this module is of use for you
>> - if there are wishes to get more functionality - if it makes sense at
>> all
>> - if there are feature requests.
> You can't force people to comment. Do you have a blog where you can
> report new functionality or bug fixes? That might help drive interest.

Good input. I was trying to blog several times, but somehow lost it, again.
Thanks a lot, I will force myself to blog. (but I'm more into email
conversations, maybe doing stuff for too long ? )

> ...
> If you are writing software for fame and attention, you're in the wrong
> industry :)

I assume not, at least I think. I want to do things right, and to
see if they are right or if I'm on the wrong track, that's why I want the feedback.
And I got quite some feedback on Stackless Python, but tiffany is a small niche
project for probably orders of magnitude less people.

> BTW, I have no need for your software, but that doesn't mean it isn't a
> good and valuable piece of work. Thank you for sharing it with the
> community, even if only a few people find it useful.

Thanks for the adjustment. Now I'm feeling fine and will move on to
other targets ;-)

cheers -- Chris

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer@stackless.com>
tismerysoft GmbH             :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam                :     PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
work +49 173 24 18 776  mobile +49 173 24 18 776  fax n.a.
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
       whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24512

...
> Thanks for the adjustment. Now I'm feeling fine and will move on to
> other targets ;-)

By the way:
Our conversation seems to have a real effect on downloads. :-)

It has been quite a boost since 20 hours from some 25-40 to now
over 200.

cheers -- chris

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer@stackless.com>
tismerysoft GmbH             :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam                :     PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
work +49 173 24 18 776  mobile +49 173 24 18 776  fax n.a.
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
       whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24513

On 27.06.12 15:24, Christian Tismer wrote:
> ...
>> Thanks for the adjustment. Now I'm feeling fine and will move on to
>> other targets ;-)
>
> By the way:
> Our conversation seems to have a real effect on downloads. :-)
>
> It has been quite a boost since 20 hours from some 25-40 to now
> over 200.
but it _may_ be that this is also an effect of supporting python 3.2,
which probably made quite much sense, after all.

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer@stackless.com>
tismerysoft GmbH             :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam                :     PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
work +49 173 24 18 776  mobile +49 173 24 18 776  fax n.a.
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
       whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web