Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #97098 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-24 16:10 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-09-24 16:10 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Modifying signature of ctor in class Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:10 -0600
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-24 16:10 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Modifying signature of ctor in class |
| Message-ID | <mailman.150.1443132660.28679.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> wrote: > I have a class factory where I dynamically add a constructor to the class output. > The method is a closure and works just fine, however to accommodate the varied > input its signature is (*args, **kwargs). > > While I modify the doc strings, the ctor sig is not optimal. Without building > this a string and using eval, is there anything that can be done about this? In Python 3.3+ you can attach a Signature object to a function by setting the function's __signature__ attribute. In Python 3.4+ the __signature__ is used in generating the signature for PyDoc and help().
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web