Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #103532 > unrolled thread

Re: Cycling through iterables diagonally

Started byPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
First post2016-02-26 10:59 +0100
Last post2016-02-26 10:59 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Cycling through iterables diagonally Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-02-26 10:59 +0100

#103532 — Re: Cycling through iterables diagonally

FromPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Date2016-02-26 10:59 +0100
SubjectRe: Cycling through iterables diagonally
Message-ID<mailman.143.1456480794.20994.python-list@python.org>
Pablo Lucena wrote:

> Say I have a group of 4 lists as follows:
> 
> l1 = ['a1', 'a2', 'a3', 'a4']
> l2 = ['b1', 'b2', 'b3', 'b4']
> l3 = ['c1', 'c2', 'c3', 'c4']
> l4 = ['d1', 'd2', 'd3', 'd4']
> 
> I would like to cycle through these lists "diagonally" in groups of
> len(list) (in this example, each list has 4 items).

> Prior to this I was mucking around with index counting while looping, and
> popping lists out of a deque, popping an item out of the list, and
> appending the list back into the deque during each iteration.
> 
> Is there a better/cleaner way to do this? I was hoping for some cool
> itertools logic =)

I have a weak spot for the itertools myself, but I think in terms of clarity 
it is hard to beat the conventional

def diagonals(a):
    N = len(a)
    for i in range(N):
        for k in range(N):
            yield a[k][(k+i)%N]

print(list(diagonals([l1, l2, l3, l4])))

Of course that's as uncool as it can get ;)

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web