Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #102750 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-09 19:39 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-09 19:39 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: There has to be a better way to split this string! Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2016-02-09 19:39 -0600
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 19:39 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: There has to be a better way to split this string! |
| Message-ID | <mailman.14.1455069687.7749.python-list@python.org> |
On 2016-02-09 19:26, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> myfile-2015-02-09-19-08-45-4223
>
> Notice I'm replacing all of the "."'s, " "'s, and ":"'s returned by
> datetime.now() with "-"'s. I'm doing that using the following code
> but it's freaking ugly and I KNOW there is a better way to do it. I
> just can't seem to think of it right now. Can anyone help? What is
> the "right", or at least, less ugly, way to do this task?
>
> unprocessed_tag = str(datetime.datetime.now())
> removed_spaces = unprocessed_tag.split(" ")
> intermediate_string = removed_spaces[0] + "-" +
> removed_spaces[1] removed_colons = intermediate_string.split(":")
> intermediate_string = removed_colons[0] + "-" +
> removed_colons[1]
> + "-" + removed_colons[2]
> removed_dots = intermediate_string.split(".")
> final_string = removed.dots[0] + "-" + removed_dots[1]
Why not format it the way you want to begin with?
>>> datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M-%S-%f")
'2016-02-09-19-38-17-972532'
-tkc
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web