Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #35650 > unrolled thread

RE: Function Parameters

Started by"Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com>
First post2012-12-27 20:47 +0000
Last post2012-12-27 20:47 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  RE: Function Parameters "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> - 2012-12-27 20:47 +0000

#35650 — RE: Function Parameters

From"Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com>
Date2012-12-27 20:47 +0000
SubjectRE: Function Parameters
Message-ID<mailman.1366.1356641342.29569.python-list@python.org>
> Don't use kwargs for this.  List out the arguments in the function
> spec and give the optional ones reasonable defaults.

> I only use kwargs myself when the set of possible arguments is dynamic
> or unknown.

Gotch ya, but when the inputs to some keywords are similar, if the function is called
with two of three (which is valid) and the arg name isn't used, the assignment is order
dependent and arbitrary in a sense and I can not distinguish.

It would be nice if you could force the keyword to be mandatory to forgo the assumption
in assignment like kwargs provides with gets. I suppose all the time wasted here is in vain
as the caller could blunder elsewhere...

Thanks,
jlc

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web