Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #57116 > unrolled thread

skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead

Started byPeter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com>
First post2013-10-19 14:44 -0700
Last post2013-10-21 00:16 -0700
Articles 4 on this page of 24 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-19 14:44 -0700
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-10-19 17:55 -0400
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-19 15:11 -0700
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-10-19 23:18 +0100
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-19 22:30 +0000
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-19 17:07 -0700
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-19 17:42 -0700
      Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-10-19 21:13 -0400
      Detecting whether a value was passed for a parameter (was: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-20 22:50 +1100
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 00:09 -0700
      Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-20 08:55 -0400
      Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-10-20 14:16 +0100
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 01:46 -0700
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 07:27 -0700
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 10:57 -0700
      Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-20 16:44 -0400
      Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-21 07:57 +1100
        Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 14:34 -0700
          Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-20 18:31 -0400
            Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-21 10:55 +1100
              Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-10-21 18:47 +0000
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 21:30 -0700
    Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 21:31 -0700
      Re: skipping __init__ and using exploiting a class member instead feedthetroll@gmx.de - 2013-10-21 00:16 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#57199

FromNeil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu>
Date2013-10-21 18:47 +0000
Message-ID<bclb5tF3ck8U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#57161
On 2013-10-20, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> writes:
>
>> Scott Meyers is an incredibly smart C++ wizard.  His books are amazing.  
>> The fact that it takes somebody that smart, and books that amazing, to 
>> teach you how not to shoot yourself in the foot with a C++ compiler says 
>> a lot about the language.
>
> +1 QotW

The existence of the STL shows a counterpoint to the complexity.
There are rewards for the complexity, in other words. Some of the
recipes in Meyers' books are amazing: The combination of class
templates, the envelope pattern, and template specialization, for
example; you get a generic interface with a decoupled
implementation which can be optimized for specific types at need.

-- 
Neil Cerutti

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57167

FromPeter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com>
Date2013-10-20 21:30 -0700
Message-ID<a3f593cf-0d11-4947-adea-17e42138a77c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#57116
That sound you here is Roy Smith hitting the nail on the head re: C++ and Scott Meyers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57168

FromPeter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com>
Date2013-10-20 21:31 -0700
Message-ID<03096a6f-b8b2-4dc5-b884-4bd565327576@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#57116
That sound you hear is Roy Smith hitting the nail on the head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#57176

Fromfeedthetroll@gmx.de
Date2013-10-21 00:16 -0700
Message-ID<a75c7571-5603-4d2f-831b-720549258f06@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#57168
Am Montag, 21. Oktober 2013 06:31:36 UTC+2 schrieb Peter Cacioppi:
> That sound you hear is Roy Smith hitting the nail on the head.

PLONK: The sound you hear, when a context-less troll is hitting the bottom of my killfile.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web