Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #87061 > unrolled thread

Re: http: connection reset by peer

Started byEmile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com>
First post2015-03-06 13:36 -0800
Last post2015-03-07 09:51 +1100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: http: connection reset by peer Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-03-06 13:36 -0800
    Re: http: connection reset by peer Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-06 22:12 +0000
      Re: http: connection reset by peer Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-07 09:51 +1100

#87061 — Re: http: connection reset by peer

FromEmile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com>
Date2015-03-06 13:36 -0800
SubjectRe: http: connection reset by peer
Message-ID<mailman.127.1425677823.21433.python-list@python.org>
On 3/5/2015 12:18 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:

>> After mucking about with it with no results, I went on to another job -- when I came back to this one it was working.
>
> Huh. Well, if it recurs, see what you can find out about it...
> otherwise, problem solved!

Well, no remaining symptoms.  I don't consider a problem solved if I 
fail to understand the context.

Emile


[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#87064

FromGrant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Date2015-03-06 22:12 +0000
Message-ID<mdd8o9$cas$1@reader1.panix.com>
In reply to#87061
On 2015-03-06, Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> wrote:
> On 3/5/2015 12:18 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
>
>>> After mucking about with it with no results, I went on to another job
>>> -- when I came back to this one it was working.
>>
>> Huh. Well, if it recurs, see what you can find out about it...
>> otherwise, problem solved!
>
> Well, no remaining symptoms.  I don't consider a problem solved if I 
> fail to understand the context.

In cases like that, I don't call the problem solved.  I prefer to say
that the problem "went away".  :)

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! I think I am an
                                  at               overnight sensation right
                              gmail.com            now!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87065

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2015-03-07 09:51 +1100
Message-ID<mailman.128.1425682295.21433.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#87064
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 2015-03-06, Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> wrote:
>> On 3/5/2015 12:18 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
>>
>>>> After mucking about with it with no results, I went on to another job
>>>> -- when I came back to this one it was working.
>>>
>>> Huh. Well, if it recurs, see what you can find out about it...
>>> otherwise, problem solved!
>>
>> Well, no remaining symptoms.  I don't consider a problem solved if I
>> fail to understand the context.
>
> In cases like that, I don't call the problem solved.  I prefer to say
> that the problem "went away".  :)

It's like with Mythbusters. They ask JD Nelson to help them to make
something 'go away'.

ChrisA

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web