Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #37972 > unrolled thread

Re: pyrudp

Started byJorge Alberto Diaz Orozco <jaorozco@estudiantes.uci.cu>
First post2013-01-30 19:04 -0500
Last post2013-01-30 19:04 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  Re: pyrudp Jorge Alberto Diaz Orozco <jaorozco@estudiantes.uci.cu> - 2013-01-30 19:04 -0500

#37972 — Re: pyrudp

FromJorge Alberto Diaz Orozco <jaorozco@estudiantes.uci.cu>
Date2013-01-30 19:04 -0500
SubjectRe: pyrudp
Message-ID<mailman.1237.1359590663.2939.python-list@python.org>
I have restrictions in my system that does not allow me to use TCP, so I want to make a pipe over UDP imitating TCP behavior.
I have control over both endpoints, and I´m writing both of them.
I just don´t want to re-invent the wheel and I´m looking for a reliable UDP sockets implementation for Python so I can start from there.

_____________

It's nice to "want" but what is your actual condition/problem?  Are you 
trying to re-invent the wheel, implement a senior project, or are you 
trying to work around some administrative or technical restriction 
against tcp?  What's the use case?

Do you have control over both ends?  Are you writing both ends of the 
imitation tcp you're writing?

One of the car magazines published a road test of the Mercedes GT 
(garbage truck).  It had plenty of power, but its top speed was 6 mph, 
and it leaned horribly around the pylon obstacle course.  Not what I'd 
take to the race track.

Point is that a definitive specification of requirements will be much 
more useful than a simple wanna.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web