Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #37967 > unrolled thread

Re: pyrudp

Started byDave Angel <davea@davea.name>
First post2013-01-30 17:14 -0500
Last post2013-01-30 17:14 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: pyrudp Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-01-30 17:14 -0500

#37967 — Re: pyrudp

FromDave Angel <davea@davea.name>
Date2013-01-30 17:14 -0500
SubjectRe: pyrudp
Message-ID<mailman.1233.1359584106.2939.python-list@python.org>
On 01/30/2013 02:55 PM, Jorge Alberto Diaz Orozco wrote:
> I want to use a reliable UDP connection like you say, a TCP like connection but over UDP. thaks for your recomendation, if I get good results I promise to share them.
>

It's nice to "want" but what is your actual condition/problem?  Are you 
trying to re-invent the wheel, implement a senior project, or are you 
trying to work around some administrative or technical restriction 
against tcp?  What's the use case?

Do you have control over both ends?  Are you writing both ends of the 
imitation tcp you're writing?

One of the car magazines published a road test of the Mercedes GT 
(garbage truck).  It had plenty of power, but its top speed was 6 mph, 
and it leaned horribly around the pylon obstacle course.  Not what I'd 
take to the race track.

Point is that a definitive specification of requirements will be much 
more useful than a simple wanna.

-- 
DaveA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web