Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #75187 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-07-24 21:58 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-07-24 21:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
RE: Using pyVmomi "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> - 2014-07-24 21:58 +0000
| From | "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-07-24 21:58 +0000 |
| Subject | RE: Using pyVmomi |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12304.1406239175.18130.python-list@python.org> |
> You could: > > - have a single point of entry that can check and, if necessary, revalidate > > - create a helper that checks and, if necessary, revalidate, which is then > called where ever needed > > - create a decorator that does the above for each function that needs it Hi Ethan, Turns out the module in Pypi lacks what the latest release shipped with ESXi and obviously what github has. There is apparently a restartable strategy that I am working with now. I thought of a decorator implementing the retry idiom but as these are simply objects not functions that doesn't apply. I'd have to go options 1 or 2. Hopefully the restartable strategy suffices. Thanks, jlc
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web