Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106737 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-09 17:24 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-09 17:24 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: how to convert code that uses cmp to python3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-04-09 17:24 +0200
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 17:24 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: how to convert code that uses cmp to python3 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.122.1460215489.2253.python-list@python.org> |
Op 09-04-16 om 16:41 schreef Chris Angelico: > > In this case, you're likely to end up with large branches of your tree > that have the same prefix. (And if you don't, your iterations are all > going to end early anyway, so the comparison is cheap.) A data > structure that takes this into account will out-perform the naive > comparison model every time. In fact, a simple dict will probably > out-perform your tree; So? I need a structure that can easily give me an answer to the following: Given key1 and key2 what are the the keys between them with their corresponding values. As long as a dict can't provide me with that answer, it doesn't matter that it will out perform lookups in my trees. -- Antoon Pardon
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web