Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29922 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-09-24 15:42 -0400 |
| Last post | 2012-09-24 15:42 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fastest web framework Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2012-09-24 15:42 -0400
| From | Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-24 15:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fastest web framework |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1204.1348515724.27098.python-list@python.org> |
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 12:19 +0300, Andriy Kornatskyy wrote: > I have run recently a benchmark of a trivial 'hello world' application for various python web frameworks (bottle, django, flask, pyramid, web.py, wheezy.web) hosted in uWSGI/cpython2.7 and gunicorn/pypy1.9... you might find it interesting: > > http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/09/python-fastest-web-framework.html > > Comments or suggestions are welcome. > The thing I don't like about these benchmarks is.. they tell you which framework is best for writing a trivial 'hello world' application. But no one writes trivial 'hello world' applications. A framework/programming language/software package/what-have-you. Can be really fast for trivial stuff, but perform much less favorably when performing "real-world" tasks. It's kind of the same argument that's used when people say X computer boots faster than Y computer. That's nice and all, but I spend much more of my time *using* my computer than *booting* it, so it doesn't give me a good picture of how the computers perform. This is why most "good" benchmarks run a series various tests based on real-world use cases. -a
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web