Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74658 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-07-17 14:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-07-17 14:03 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Blocked thread Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2014-07-17 14:03 -0400
| From | Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-07-17 14:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Blocked thread |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11940.1405620209.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> wrote: >> I can have as many connections to the db server as I want, that's not >> the issue. The issue is that my main thread seems to be blocked in the >> join(), so I guess I'm going to need a separate script. I was trying >> to avoid that. > > Right, but what you're trying to do is monitor the local thread, by > spinning off a thread to do the deletion and then keeping an eye on it > by attempting a timed join. I'm saying it'd probably be easier to do > the monitoring on the server end, via a second connection. (It most > likely doesn't need special database privileges, even; at least in > PostgreSQL, any user can see pg_stat_activity entries for the same > user.) That's usually going to be more reliable, plus the server can > tell you whether the deletion is blocked waiting for a lock or busy > writing to the disk or something else. Yes, I agree, but the second connection will have to be in a second script, not the main thread of the script I have.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web