Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #44558 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-04-30 18:54 +0100 |
| Last post | 2013-04-30 18:54 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: python process accounting Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-04-30 18:54 +0100
| From | Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-30 18:54 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: python process accounting |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1191.1367344504.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On 2013-04-30 17:38, Dave Angel wrote: > On 04/30/2013 12:25 PM, Rita wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if it possible to write a python wrapper which will account >> my processes. I would like to account for all the children processes (fork) >> by looking at their /proc/<pid> info. Such as memory, io, open files, >> stats. >> >> So, instead of me running "/bin/sleep 10", i would like to run it as >> "pywrap.py /bin/sleep 10" and it will do an exec /bin/sleep 10 and do a >> periodic snapshot for whats in /proc/<pid>/stats. > > I only understood a quarter of that. But if you want to sleep, why not just > call time.sleep ? I think that was just a placeholder example, not the program he actually wants to measure. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web