Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #74285 > unrolled thread

Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes

Started byIan Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
First post2014-07-09 17:34 -0600
Last post2014-07-09 17:34 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-07-09 17:34 -0600

#74285 — Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes

FromIan Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date2014-07-09 17:34 -0600
SubjectRe: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes
Message-ID<mailman.11718.1404948936.18130.python-list@python.org>
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Anders J. Munch <2014@jmunch.dk> wrote:
> Joel Goldstick wrote:
>>
>> I've been following along here, and it seems you haven't received the
>> answer you want or need.
>
>
> So far I received exactly the answer I was expecting.  0 examples of
> NaN!=NaN being beneficial.
> I wasn't asking for help, I was making a point.  Whether that will lead to
> improvement of Python, well, I'm not too optimistic, but I feel the point
> was worth making regardless.

If the reason there were 0 examples is because the group that you
posed the question to is lacking the kind of experience needed to be
able to provide them (speaking for myself, I wouldn't know because I
don't ever do anything with NaN beyond checking for it as an error
condition), then the point hasn't really been made, has it?

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web