Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74282 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-07-09 15:21 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-07-09 15:21 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-07-09 15:21 -0700
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-07-09 15:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11715.1404944503.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 07/09/2014 02:09 PM, Anders J. Munch wrote: > Ethan Furman: >> >> I would suggest you ask for this on the numerical mailing lists instead of here -- and you may not want to offer a >> beer to everyone that has an anecdote for NaN behavior being useful. > > I don't have time to start this discussion over again on another mailing list. Don't anyone on those lists read > python-list also? I believe there are a handful, but I don't know how active they are here. For a straight-up numbers type question, especially about NaN and who's using it to what effect, a numbers or scientific mailing list is really the way to go. -- ~Ethan~
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web