Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #74263 > unrolled thread

Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes

Started byEthan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
First post2014-07-09 09:42 -0700
Last post2014-07-09 09:42 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-07-09 09:42 -0700

#74263 — Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes

FromEthan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Date2014-07-09 09:42 -0700
SubjectRe: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes
Message-ID<mailman.11698.1404924234.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 07/08/2014 07:53 AM, Anders J. Munch wrote:
>
> So I make this claim: float.__eq__ implementing IEEE-754 NaN
> comparison rules creates real problems for developers. And it has
> never, ever, helped anyone do anything.
>
> "Never" is a strong claim, and easily disproven if false: Simply
> provide a counterexample.  So that is my challenge: If you have a
> program (a pre-existing and useful one, not something artificial
> created for this challenge) that benefits from NaN!=NaN and that would
> fail if x==x for all float objects x, then please come forward and
> show it, and I'll buy you a beer the next time I'm at PyCon.

I would suggest you ask for this on the numerical mailing lists instead of here -- and you may not want to offer a beer 
to everyone that has an anecdote for NaN behavior being useful.

--
~Ethan~

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web