Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74211 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Anders J. Munch" <2014@jmunch.dk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-07-08 22:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2014-07-08 22:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [Python-Dev] == on object tests identity in 3.x "Anders J. Munch" <2014@jmunch.dk> - 2014-07-08 22:10 +0200
| From | "Anders J. Munch" <2014@jmunch.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-07-08 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [Python-Dev] == on object tests identity in 3.x |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11662.1404850261.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Steven D'Aprano wrote: > - Dropping reflexivity preserves the useful property that NANs compare > unequal to everything. Please present an example from real life where that turned out useful, and earn yourself a beer! I've only experienced examples to the contrary. > - Keeping reflexivity for NANs would have implied some pretty nasty > things, e.g. if log(-3) == log(-5), then -3 == -5. >>> log(-3) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> ValueError: math domain error You were perhaps referring to the log functions in C and Fortran, not math.log? The tradeoffs are different in those languages, so choices the IEEE-754 committee made with C and Fortran in mind may be less relevant for Python. regards, Anders
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web