Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74203 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Anders J. Munch" <2014@jmunch.dk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-07-08 21:06 +0200 |
| Last post | 2014-07-08 21:06 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes "Anders J. Munch" <2014@jmunch.dk> - 2014-07-08 21:06 +0200
| From | "Anders J. Munch" <2014@jmunch.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-07-08 21:06 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11655.1404846372.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Den 14-07-08 19:23, Skip Montanaro skrev: > > In addition to what others have written, I will add one thing. There > are certainly situations where raising an exception is bad. Consider > all the people in the scientific computing community doing fancy > linear algebra sorts of things, often with missing data. They > generally want NaN propagated and not have some long running > calculation crash in the middle. NaN!=NaN doesn't cause NaN's to propagate any more or any less. It simply causes a different branch of code to run, quite often the wrong one. regards, Anders
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web