Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74059 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-07-06 10:41 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-07-06 10:41 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Re: Question about metacharacter '*' Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> - 2014-07-06 10:41 -0700
| From | Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-07-06 10:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Question about metacharacter '*' |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11561.1404686462.18130.python-list@python.org> |
>In article <d8f8d76d-0a47-4f59-8f09-da2a44cc1d2e@googlegroups.com>, > Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As an aside i prefer to only utilize a "character set" when >> nothing else will suffice. And in this case r"[0-9][0-9]*" >> can be expressed just as correctly (and less noisy IMHO) as >> r"\d\d*". > >Even better, r"\d+" I tend tot do that too, even though technically the two are not perfectly equivalent. With the re.LOCALE flag LC_ctype is also affected, which affects what is captured by \d but not by [0-9]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web