Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #74059 > unrolled thread

Re: Question about metacharacter '*'

Started byAlbert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com>
First post2014-07-06 10:41 -0700
Last post2014-07-06 10:41 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  Re: Question about metacharacter '*' Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> - 2014-07-06 10:41 -0700

#74059 — Re: Question about metacharacter '*'

FromAlbert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com>
Date2014-07-06 10:41 -0700
SubjectRe: Question about metacharacter '*'
Message-ID<mailman.11561.1404686462.18130.python-list@python.org>


>In article <d8f8d76d-0a47-4f59-8f09-da2a44cc1d2e@googlegroups.com>,
> Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As an aside i prefer to only utilize a "character set" when
>> nothing else will suffice. And in this case r"[0-9][0-9]*"
>> can be expressed just as correctly  (and less noisy IMHO) as
>> r"\d\d*".
>
>Even better, r"\d+"

I tend tot do that too, even though technically the two are not perfectly equivalent. With the re.LOCALE flag LC_ctype is also affected, which affects what is captured by \d but not by [0-9]

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web