Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #95287 > unrolled thread

Re: Ensure unwanted names removed in class definition

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2015-08-13 01:59 +1000
Last post2015-08-13 01:59 +1000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Ensure unwanted names removed in class definition Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 01:59 +1000

#95287 — Re: Ensure unwanted names removed in class definition

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-13 01:59 +1000
SubjectRe: Ensure unwanted names removed in class definition
Message-ID<mailman.114.1439395153.3627.python-list@python.org>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
> But I would probably use a generator expression. These don't leak names:
>
> Python 2.7.6 (default, Jun 22 2015, 17:58:13)
> [GCC 4.8.2] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>> class Parrot:
> ...     a = [per for per in "abc"]
> ...     b = list(trans for trans in "def")
> ...

Ooh neat trick! Much cleaner than the explicit lambda that I
suggested. Withdrawing my recommendation in favour of this (but with
an explanatory comment explaining why list(genexp) is used rather than
a list comp).

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web