Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #4584 > unrolled thread

Re: vertical ordering of functions

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: vertical ordering of functions Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-04 08:31 +1000

#4584 — Re: vertical ordering of functions

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just reading Robert M. Martin's book entitled "Clean Code". In Ch.
> 5 he says that a function that is called should be below a function
> that does the calling. This creates a nice flow down from top to
> bottom.

I prefer to define my terms before I use them. Classes, functions, etc
get defined at the top and called down below. It's a stylistic thing,
but it ties in with what you would do in a debate or scholarly
document; and if you're skimming such a document and you don't
understand a term, you know to scan upwards for its definition.

It's just a stylistic thing, you can do it whichever way you think best!

Chris Angelico

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web